Back to Projects
Offline Automation Tester Coding Assistant

Offline Automation Tester Coding Assistant

LLMLocal AIPythonProductivity

The Challenge

Automation testers often work in secure environments without internet access, limiting their ability to use cloud-based AI coding assistants.

The Solution

Developed a local LLM-based assistant fine-tuned on automation libraries (Selenium, Appium). It runs entirely offline, ensuring data security while providing context-aware code suggestions.

Key Features

  • Local LLM
  • Coding Assistant

Case Study: Offline-First Intelligent Coding Assistant

Project Context

The Offline Coding Assistant is a privacy-focused, AI-powered development tool designed to provide intelligent code assistance without relying on constant internet connectivity or exposing sensitive code to third-party cloud services. It features a hybrid architecture that allows developers to seamlessly switch between powerful cloud-based Large Language Models (LLMs) and efficient, locally running models. By integrating Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), the assistant can "read" and understand local codebases and documentation, providing context-aware answers that generic AI tools cannot match.

Key Objectives

  • Ensure Data Privacy: Enable developers to work on proprietary or sensitive code without sending data to external servers.
  • Enable Offline Productivity: Provide robust AI assistance in air-gapped environments or situations with poor connectivity.
  • Context-Aware Accuracy: Implement RAG to ground AI responses in the specific context of the user's local project files and documentation.
  • Hybrid Flexibility: Offer a user-friendly toggle to switch between "Offline" (privacy-first) and "Online" (performance-first) modes.

Stakeholders/Users

  • Software Engineers: Working on proprietary IP or in regulated industries (finance, healthcare).
  • Remote Developers: Working in areas with unstable internet connections.
  • Open Source Maintainers: Needing a tool that understands their specific package architecture.

Technical Background

  • Frontend: React, Vite, Tailwind CSS (inferred from standard practices).
  • Backend: Python, FastAPI.
  • AI/ML Engine:
    • Local Inference: llama-cpp-python (GGUF format), transformers, PyTorch.
    • Models: Qwen 1.5 (1.8B), TinyLlama 1.1B.
    • Online Inference: Google Gemini Pro API.
  • Data Storage: ChromaDB (Vector Database for RAG).

Problem

The Privacy & Connectivity Gap

Modern developers rely heavily on AI assistants like ChatGPT or Copilot. However, these tools introduce significant risks and limitations:

  • Data Leakage: Pasting proprietary code into public web interfaces exposes intellectual property to third-party training data.
  • Internet Dependency: A loss of connectivity renders these tools useless, disrupting workflows for remote workers or those in secure, air-gapped facilities.
  • Lack of Local Context: General LLMs are trained on public data and do not understand the specific nuances, variable names, or architectural patterns of a private codebase.

Risks & Inefficiencies

  • Security Compliance: Many organizations strictly forbid sending code to external APIs, forcing developers to work without AI aid.
  • Generic Answers: Without access to the local file system, standard AIs provide generic code snippets that often require heavy refactoring to fit the existing project structure.

Challenges

Technical Hurdles

  • Hardware Constraints: Running LLMs locally is resource-intensive. The challenge was to deliver acceptable inference speeds on standard consumer CPUs (without requiring high-end GPUs) while maintaining response quality.
  • Model Hallucination: Smaller local models (1B-2B parameters) are prone to "hallucinations" or incorrect syntax compared to massive cloud models.
  • Complex Dependency Management: Integrating diverse libraries like llama-cpp-python, torch, and chromadb across different operating systems (Windows/Linux) created significant compatibility friction.

Operational Constraints

  • Latency vs. Quality: Balancing the trade-off between the speed of local execution and the depth of reasoning provided by the model.
  • Seamless Switching: The system needed to hot-swap between local and online backends without restarting the server or reloading heavy model weights unnecessarily.

Solution

Hybrid RAG Architecture

We developed a Hybrid Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system that decouples the reasoning engine from the knowledge base.

1. Dual-Mode Inference Engine

We implemented a Factory Pattern in the backend (LLMService) to manage different providers dynamically:

  • Offline Mode: Utilizes Qwen 1.5 (1.8B) and TinyLlama 1.1B in GGUF format. These models are quantized (compressed) to run efficiently on CPUs using llama-cpp-python, ensuring low latency and low memory footprint (<2GB RAM).
  • Online Mode: Integrates Google Gemini Pro for scenarios where complex reasoning is required and data privacy is less critical.

2. Local Context Injection (RAG)

  • Ingestion: A background service scans the user's workspace, chunks code and documentation, and generates vector embeddings.
  • Retrieval: We used ChromaDB as a local vector store. When a user asks a question, the system retrieves relevant code snippets and injects them into the LLM's system prompt. This allows even small local models to answer highly specific questions accurately.

3. Optimized User Experience

  • Smart Toggle: A simple UI switch allows users to toggle modes instantly. The backend manages model loading states to prevent freezing.
  • Streaming Responses: Implemented server-sent events (SSE) to stream tokens to the frontend, making the application feel responsive even when local inference is slower.

Outcome/Impact

Quantifiable Improvements

  • 100% Data Privacy: In offline mode, zero bytes of data leave the user's machine, meeting strict security compliance requirements.
  • Cost Reduction: Heavy reliance on local models significantly reduces API costs associated with token usage on cloud platforms.
  • Latency Optimization: Local RAG retrieval takes <200ms, providing near-instant context fetching before generation begins.

Long-Term Benefits

  • Resilience: The development workflow remains uninterrupted during internet outages.
  • Scalability: The modular backend allows for easy addition of new open-source models (e.g., Llama 3, Mistral) as they are released, future-proofing the tool.

Summary

The Offline Coding Assistant bridges the gap between AI productivity and data security. By leveraging a hybrid architecture with quantized local models and RAG, it delivers a robust, privacy-first development experience that runs efficiently on standard hardware. This solution empowers developers to code smarter and faster, anywhere, without compromising their intellectual property.

Get In Touch

Interested in collaborating or have a question about my projects? Feel free to reach out. I'm always open to discussing new ideas and opportunities.

Say Hello